|
"Forto
- Mogorayb: Report of an Evaluation"
T. Silkin, Z. Fre, S.
King; Ref. No 050
The programme is located
in south-western Eritrea. The Forto area is mainly occupied by the Beni Amer
and Hdareb communities and the Mogorayb by the Nara.
The main thrust of the
programmme was to improve crop production but since livestock production is
significant in the area this is also studied in some detail. Some groups identify
themselves as agropastoralists while others see themselves as pastoral nomads.
In all cases, however, livestock plays an important part in the livelihood
of people.
In both areas war and
drought have had a serious impact of the economy and have forced people to
rely on food aid. The programme was designed as an integrated programme to
rehabilitate agricultural production and was designed to span a five-year
period. The main agricultural activity was to rebuild terracing for crop cultivation,
using stone and earth terracing which last longer than the wood terracing
traditionally used. Participants were rewarded by food/cash for work scheme.
The Agricultural Rehabilitation
Programmme replaced agricultural inputs lost by farmers during drought and
war; namely tools, seeds and draft animals. The need for tools was met through
opening forges to make and repair implements. Seeds were purchased locally
wherever possible but in some cases had to be purchased in Sudan. Originally
draft animals were mostly going to be oxen but the need to provide more camels
was expressed and noted for future purchases. A programme of veterinary services
was added and needs to be strengthened through training of more paravets..
Vegetable gardening hitherto
unknown in the region was introduced as part of the programme but poor rainfall
made it difficult for people successfully to maintain the crops.
Water scarcity which
has plagued the lives of people was addressed by digging wells and attempting
to provide small water catchment points but poor rainfall hampered their use.
There is a need to provide water holes for livestock and additional wells
in several areas.
Schooling in the Forto
- Mogorayb district had been non existant since the beginning of the war except
for a short period in 1985 and the project's objective was to open two schools
in each district although the plan in now to open 3 in Mogorayb and 1 in Forto.
The question of girls' education remains a contentious issue in Forto in particular
and led to the closure of co-educational schools. Some adult education was
also provided and the need for numeracy and literacy classes will be answered
when classes resume.
The provision of health
services was not subjected to technical evaluation as no health specialist
was included in the team and only general observations were made.
The evaluation reviews
the social impact of the programme.
Whereas a number of food
for work schemes have been criticised because they draw people away from agricultural
activities, in the case of this project this did not happen since the scheme
applied to the improvement of agricultural land. Farmers thought the scheme
was beneficial on several counts: it can be combined with other activities,
offers reliable and regular work, keeps communities together since people
do not have to travel for work outside, and offers an acceptable level of
payment.
The evaluation argues
that the programme mainly addressed the question of enhancing crop production
and in so doing only tackled part of the problem of food security. It suggests
that more attention should be paid to pastoralism which represents an important
source of food security for households. This view is shared by participants
who feel that pastoralism was not given enough prominance. The balance should
be redressed by the work carried out by PENHA.
The impact on the environment
may have been adeversely affected by some components of the programme which
promoted a farming system which entailed clearing vegetation. The arrival
of returnees from Sudan is perceived as putting added pressure on resources.
It is generally accepted
that, given the focus of the programme and the position of women in Beni Amer
and Nara communities, the programme could only have a limited impact on women.
Some respondents however, drew particular attention to the fact that increased
food security and cash for work had limited men's migration thus relieving
women of the added burden which migration gives rise to. Women felt they had
not been provided with enough grinding mills and that more should be provided.
Added activities which women could undertake were: poultry production and
back-yard gardening.
The development of social
infrastructure was thought to be the most beneficial aspect of the programme
which of course, is precisely what had been intended. It has allowed people
to break their isolation and feel part of the wider national structure.
|